Poster Abstracts
This presentation illustrates a framework for analysing the objectivity of taxonomy projects and shows how it can illuminate the political nature of practical taxonomy work as mediation of differing viewpoints, or as a balancing of subjectivity and objectivity.
Theoretical background. The US philosopher Helen Longino proposes that the subjective/objective distinction is a false dichotomy in a scientific inquiry, arguing instead that objectivity depends on a process of intersubjective creation of meaning (Longino, H. (1990) Science as Social Knowledge). Similarly the creation of a taxonomy depends on negotiating an agreement on terminology choices and categorisations within a particular socio-cultural context. Longino asserts that for scientific inquiry to be objective, it must satisfy four criteria:
- Openness to criticism
- Responsiveness to criticism
- Public accessibility of standards
- Equality of intellectual authority of contributors
These criteria can be used as a framework for assessing the essentially “political” process of mediation that a taxonomist must undertake, illuminating the
degree of “objectivity” of a taxonomy project.
Methodology and results.
Fourteen taxonomy professionals were interviewed about 15 diverse taxonomy projects and their responses scored against a set of five questions exploring
each of Longino’s four criteria. The projects were ranked. Large-scale public projects scored higher than projects in the commercial sector and small-scale
or specialist projects scored lowest.
Conclusions.
This research intends to show that Longino’s framework is a useful way of highlighting the degree of “objectivity” of a taxonomy project, and that the level of
“objectivity” is related to the political nature of the project and how the role of “taxonomist as politician” is formally supported. There would also seem to
be a similarity between established industry best practice (especially for well-resourced projects), and satisfaction of Longino’s criteria for objectivity.
[Short paper]
The central aim of this poster is to describe the development of a virtual resources library with specialized contents on the field of cardiovascular diseases, organized according to a faceted organisation of categories. We understand “facets” as the classes of the different categories of one specific subject field. The information of our e-library is classified following two main different criteria: On one hand depending on the subject(s) of the documents, ordered by an onomasiological structure. For instance, we sorted the cardiovascular diseases into more specific subfields like cardiovascular abnormalities (vascular malformations, heart defects, etc.); heart diseases (arhythmias, heart failure, heart neoplasms, etc.); vascular diseases (hypertension, stroke, etc.).
On the other hand we take into consideration the characteristics and attributes of the more usual information in the biomedical areas. The classification was made depending on the form, the structure or the type of content of the document and we had classes like reference documents (atlas, books, clinical practice guidelines, databases, dictionaries and glossaries, etc.); information about congresses and other meetings; health and medical portals or associations. In addition, all the different categories and classes (subjects as well as document types) have been labelled in two languages, Spanish and English, to allow the recovery of the information no matter which language is used.
Without a doubt one of the most important aspects for the quality of information resources is the accuracy of the retrieval of the contents, avoiding the silence and the documental noise and more precisely the faceted classification methodology gives us the possibility to deal with more than one category and so increasing the relevancy of the search results.
Directgov’s vision is to be the citizen-focussed digital channel for government. By 2011, Directgov will be the principal online destination for citizens to interact with government online. It already receives over 18 million visits a month, and brings together information from all over government. The convergence programme is reducing the number of government websites, and bringing their content onto Directgov. This means the site will grow in size and complexity, hence the need for a robust, scaleable information architecture. The metadata model is a core part of this.
The model and its associated taxonomies provide consistent, user-friendly metadata terms to build applications on, for example, powering facets and filters in Search, and supporting a “What’s new?” aggregation of the most recent content to be published.
The model has to meet both end-user and business needs in four key areas:
- Describing content
- Enabling Search enhancement
- Managing content
- Specifying ownership of content
- The origins and design of several collection databases (essentially metadata repositories)
- Australian and international initiatives and progress towards management of Digital Collections
- Data Migration initiatives – progress and pitfalls - where to from here? (trying to fit a square peg in a round hole)
[Poster outline]
For enquiries please contact: conference2009@iskouk.org









